August 22nd, 2004

marcus 2013

More Stereoscopic Pictures

What it says really - I got all 36 scanned and processed last night, and I thought I might show a few of the more interesting ones here. These are jpegs with relatively little compression, gets them small enough for Photobucket without quality problems. I've had to remove a lot of spots and marks, the snag is that whatever you fix has to be okay when superimposed as the stereo image. I think I'm okay on this, but tell me if I'm wrong. I also think I need to redo the perspective on a couple of the colour overlays, I thought they looked okay last night but I was pretty tired. [later edit - new versions now uploaded]

Behind the cuts for obvious reasons:

Collapse )
Collapse )
Collapse )
Collapse )
marcus 2013

Another (slightly problematic) stereogram

Question especially for American readers.

This is one of the pictures I've scanned in, but I'm a little worried that I'll offend over-delicate sensibilities by including it without comment, given its title. I'm going to include it, but I'm wondering if there should be some sort of disclaimer. Suggestions would be appreciated.

Collapse )